Your assessment should be based on the quality of the contribution, not its style. Furthermore, reviewers will In this Anonymized smartphone-based mobility data has been widely adopted in devising and evaluating COVID-19 response strategies such as the targeting of public health resources. DO NOT talk to anyone about specific submissions, reviews, or discussions of papers that you reviewed after decisions have been announced. Our results speak to a tension between the desire to keep a proprietary model secret and the ability to offer model explanations. If this happens, please do not divulge the identities to anyone, but do tell the Track Chair that this has happened and make a note of this in the Confidential Comments to Program Chairs text field when you submit your review. #FAccT2023 Note that submitting research for approval by each authors institutional ethics review body (IRB) may be necessary in some cases, but by itself may not be sufficient. The research community is young but growing fast. 9. Using an Ethics of Care to Promote Diverse Voices, Differential Tweetment: Mitigating Racial Dialect Bias in Harmful Tweet Detection, Can You Fake It Until You Make It? the concerns of ACM FAccT? Those who do not pre-register their submission by the stated deadline will be unable to submit their paper to ACM FAccT. Authors are encouraged to reflect on these adjustments to the program committee. DO NOT talk to other reviewers or Track Chairs about your own submissions (i.e., submissions you are an author on) or submissions with which you have a conflict. ethical considerations. Authors of all accepted papers must present their work at the FAccT 2022 conference, regardless of whether their paper is archival or non-archival. For LaTeX Extensions of Weve marked the sections of this document with . and justice in systems, policy, and pedagogy. Since ACM FAT* targets the implications of automated decision-making based on, e.g., machine learning, the cross-disciplinary reviews are pivotal. The claims/arguments are explored in sufficient depth. If so, one cross-disciplinary reviewer will be asked to review in a 14 working day time-frame as set out above. If you accidentally find out the identities of the authors, please do not divulge the identities to anyone, but do tell your Track Chair that this has happened and make a note of this in the Confidential Comments to Track Chairs and PC Chairs text field. All FAccT is committed to strengthening the disciplinary and interdisciplinary areas it touches by maintaining a high standard of quality in the submissions it accepts. One should be 3-4 minutes long. New York, NY, Feb. 25, 2021 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency (ACM FAccT), to be held virtually from March 3-10, brings together. published short papers or abstracts, even if they appeared in formal Submissions that do not comply with this policy will be rejected without review. Please upload only one document, appending any appendices or supplementary material to the end of the submission. The results are well-grounded and conclusions avoid exaggerating the merits of the work.. For authors, it provides transparency into our decisions and, as such, guidance for revising their work for rebuttal and for their final presentation. As calls for fair and unbiased algorithmic systems increase, so too does the number of individuals working on algorithmic fairness in industry. Authors are required to pre-register their papers through the submission ACM FAccT solicits work from a wide variety of disciplines, including computer science, statistics, law, social sciences, the humanities, and policy, and multidisciplinary scholarships on fairness, accountability and transparency in computational systems (broadly construed). Note that all submissions will have the same page length requirements and will be judged by the same quality standards, regardless of whether the authors choose the archival or non-archival option. Please provide a Confidence Score between 1 and 5 for each submission, which concerns the level of confidence you have in your own expertise regarding the topic of the submission. Anomaly detection aims to find instances that are considered unusual and is a fundamental problem of data science. The ACM Journal on Responsible Computing (JRC) will publish high-quality original research at the intersection of computing, ethics, information, law, policy, responsible innovation, and social responsibility from a wide range of convergent, interdisciplinary, multidisciplinary, and transdisciplinary perspectives. Models of agent responsiveness, termed "strategic manipulation," analyze the interaction between We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. We have assessed travel intentions from most of our authors, and (depending on funding) up to 55% intend to travel to Seoul. USA, Front matter (Title, Copyright, Welcome from the General Chairs, Welcome from the Program Chairs, Contents), FAccT '23: 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, Black Feminist Musings on Algorithmic Oppression, Price Discrimination with Fairness Constraints, Fairness Violations and Mitigation under Covariate Shift, Reasons, Values, Stakeholders: A Philosophical Framework for Explainable Artificial Intelligence, Allocating Opportunities in a Dynamic Model of Intergenerational Mobility, Corporate Social Responsibility via Multi-Armed Bandits, Biases in Generative Art: A Causal Look from the Lens of Art History, Designing an Online Infrastructure for Collecting AI Data From People With Disabilities, Fifty Shades of Grey: In Praise of a Nuanced Approach Towards Trustworthy Design, Representativeness in Statistics, Politics, and Machine Learning, The Distributive Effects of Risk Prediction in Environmental Compliance: Algorithmic Design, Environmental Justice, and Public Policy, Computer Science Communities: Who is Speaking, and Who is Listening to the Women? Your comments should be detailed, specific, and polite. Chairs to better anticipate the submission load and to make necessary pages (including all figures and tables), plus unlimited pages for All accepted papers will also be presented in a proceedings session with live Q&A. The cross-disciplinary reviewer will join in the discussion as set out below but will not vote on acceptance or rejection of the paper. Simply put, a college's acceptance rate is the rate at which applicants are accepted. perspectives on fairness? Please be diligent about avoiding comments regarding English style or grammar that may be interpreted as implying the author is "foreign" or "non-native". He. Optionally, authors can upload supplementary materials (e.g., appendices) with their submission, but reviewers will not be required to read the supplementary materials, so authors are encouraged to use them judiciously. placed at risk, avoiding deceptive practices when not essential, This will allow us to find an alternate reviewer who will be better able to assess the submission. Abstract submission: 30 January 2023 11:59pm Anywhere on Earth. ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency 2022 (ACM FAccT 2023) Call For Papers. If using LaTeX, please use the template given in sample-manuscript.tex when downloading the latest version of the ACM LaTeX documents. the same reviewing rubric as all papers. Questions? include a subsection describing these issues. These systems filter, sort, score, recommend, personalize, and otherwise shape human experience, increasingly making or informing decisions with major impact on access to, e.g., credit, insurance, healthcare, parole, social security, and immigration. The ACM Digital Library is published by the Association for Computing Machinery. Contact the Program Co-chairs: program-chairs@facctconference.org. After all, risk Kearns, Neel, Roth, and Wu [ICML 2018] recently proposed a notion of rich subgroup fairness intended to bridge the gap between statistical and individual notions of fairness. technical soundness. Although machine learning models can sometimes achieve impressive Formulating data science problems is an uncertain and difficult process. HotCRP.com signin Sign in using your HotCRP.com account. (27.9% acceptance rate). However, Area Chairs and Program Chairs need to understand both the strengths and the weaknesses in order to make an informed decision. We formally show that through our conceptual mapping, many existing Data too sensitive to be "open" for analysis and re-purposing typically remains "closed" as proprietary information. Instead, meanings range from typical or characteristic, to a proportionate match between sample and population, to a more Government agencies are embracing machine learning to support a variety of resource allocation decisions. It is not fair to dismiss any submission without having thoroughly read it. Rich subgroup fairness picks a statistical fairness constraint (say, Computer vision and other biometrics data science applications have commenced a new project of profiling people. Author rebuttals: (Please note, this is a different process than that of decisions are made. It can be tempting to comment only on the weaknesses. Embedding captions, or open captions, means that the captions are burnt into the video itself and cannot be removed by the viewer, unlike closed captions, which can be turned on or off by the viewer. Archival and Non-archival Submissions. Despite vigorous debates about the technical characteristics of risk assessments being deployed in the U.S. criminal justice system, remarkably little research has studied how these tools affect actual decision-making processes. Online proceedings sessions will take place between 2100 and 0200 KST (TBC). Please describe and consider the strengths of the submission. There is one key exception. sufficient. However, there has been AI technology offers opportunities to expand virtual and physical access for people with disabilities. Note: If you feel that your confidence rating is likely to be a 1 at the end of a review due to your lack of expertise in the given subject area, you should notify the Track Chair as early as possible in the process. The authors will be asked to respond to all three peer reviews and to the cross-disciplinary review (if applicable) in their rebuttal. other forms of injustice, in society generally and within the field of For general conference information, see https://facctconference.org/2021/. Q&A will be live in both cases. While news recommenders help consumers deal with information overload and increase their engagement, their Personalization is pervasive in the online space as it leads to higher efficiency for the user and higher revenue for the platform by individualizing the most relevant content for each user. There are lots of free options available, here are just a few suggestions: Please try to make your presentation accessible for all. In this case, the authors should not cite the report, so as to preserve anonymity. Authors are not required or expected to submit a response. practice at the intersection of many disciplines. In your response, please address the degree to which the following statements apply to this work. In industrial computer vision, discretionary decisions surrounding the production of image training data remain widely undocumented. respond to initial reviews with a rebuttal. will shift to the new ACM workflow for article templates and publication Specifically, something similar to the following should appear near the top of your .tex document \documentclass[manuscript,screen,review,anonymous]{acmart}. Disentangling Inuence: Using disentangled representations to audit model predic- The submission is clearly written and well organized. The program and area papers will be reviewed by experts on the topic, from disciplines as This section can be used to provide additional If you accidentally find out, please do not divulge the identities to anyone, but do tell the Track Chairs that this has happened and make a note of this in the Confidential Comments to Program Chairs text field when you submit your review. We welcome submissions in the following areas: FAccT is an ACM conference about computing, dedicated to rigorous Two natural and competing notions of fairness might be to a) charge each individual Spurious features interfere with the goal of obtaining robust models that perform well across many groups within the population. Authors must omit their names and affiliations from submissions, and avoid obvious identifying statements. Settings such as lending and policing can be modeled by a centralized agent allocating a scarce resource (e.g. The work situates itself in the context of related work. Take your job seriously and be fair. Pre-registration only requires that you "save a draft" of your submission. ACM FAccT is an interdisciplinary conference publishing research in algorithmic fairness, accountability, and transparency. TBA) or none at all at the abstract submission deadline may be paper is accepted, authors will have to reformat their paper in the ACM Area chairs will oversee the reviewing process. New York, NY, June 15, 2022 - The 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency (ACM FAccT) will be held online and in-person in Seoul, South Korea from June 21-24 2022. Confidentiality of submitted material will be Design slides taking into account people with Dyslexia (see e.g. When appropriate, authors are encouraged to include a subsection describing these issues. FACCT-ANNOUNCE Archives ACM FAcct Announcements: FACCT-ANNOUNCE@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG: LISTSERV Archives: FACCT-ANNOUNCE Home: Log In: Register: Subscribe or Unsubscribe: Search Archives: Options: Use Forum View Use Monospaced Font Show Text Part by Default Show All Mail Headers: Message: ACM FAT* 2020 is using the FAT Conf 2020 HotCRP. will appear in the published proceedings of the conference, if they are From creating paintings to generating novel art styles, AI based generative art has showcased a variety of applications. When consequential decisions are informed by algorithmic input, individuals may feel compelled to alter their behavior in order to gain a system's approval. Such This typically corresponds to about 7,500 words for the main content. Welcome to the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (ACM FAccT 2021) submissions site. If you use an AI tool to automatically create captions from audio, please make sure to proofread and edit accordingly, to ensure that the captions accurately convey your presentation. As of May 9, about 65% of registrations include in-person attendance. Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT), 2020. IL , site by submitting a tentative title and abstract and specifying their The ACM CHI Conference, 'CHI2021', Online Virtual Conference. ACM, the Association for Computing Machinery, is the world's largest educational and scientific computing society, uniting educators, researchers, and professionals to inspire dialogue, share resources and address the field's challenges. proceedings, if they are accepted. We recommend using 16:9 Aspect Ratio, and minimum 1080p resolution. The results or conclusions are important for the FAccT academic field. Top tier venues in computer science can be thought of as leading conferences such as CVPR, NIPS, ICML, CHI, KDD, ACL, ICWSM, SIGIR, SIGMOD, STOC, or top tier journals. These works may be submitted as-is or in an extended Email Forgot your password? ACM Password computing in particular. One Label, One Billion Faces: Usage and Consistency of Racial Categories in Computer Vision. the review process to rapidly respond to queries from the PC regarding The author responses are intended to allow the authors to concisely identify perceived mistakes of fact or reasoning in the reviews that foundationally affect the assessment about their work. If English style or grammar are issues, please write your review politely, and avoid language that could be perceived as discriminatory. in order for the paper to appear in the conference proceedings in the KDD 2022 (acceptance rate: 14.99%) These include: respect for privacy, secure insufficiently addressed issues in computing such as: How do algorithmic We will expand on this below. For questions regarding registration, contact acm.facct2022@gmail.com. If you have further questions about video format, please direct them to virtual@facctconference.org. As is usual at CS conferences, the assignment of reviewers takes place by way of a bidding procedure. . Your video must have *embedded* captions (see next section). The purpose of the shorter video is to increase engagement in your work. disclosure of audits. Under no circumstances should you attempt to find out the identities of the authors for any of your assigned submissions (e.g., by searching on Google or arXiv). We strongly recommend that authors also read it to familiarize themselves with the reviewing process. FAccT22 has the same acceptance rate of previous editions but the most accepted papers so far - we received almost double the submissions of 2021, and have accepted double the number of papers (181 in total). The ACM Conference for Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency ( FAccT) has decided to suspend its sponsorship relationship with Google, conference sponsorship co-chair and Boise State. publication archive. field address the problems and opportunities of intersectional ACM FAccT. rejected without review. Acceptance rates for the major top-tier AI-related conferences Natural Language Processing and Computational Linguistics Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Machine Learning and Learning Theory Artificial Intelligence Data Mining and Information Retrieval Speech and Signal Processing Note: This paper critically examines arguments against independence, a measure of group fairness also known as statistical parity and as demographic parity. We understand ACM guidance is confusing during this transition year and will review incorrectly formatted subsmissions accordingly. Other support for diversity, equity and inclusion at FAcct 2022 will be announced. ACM FAT* papers naturally differ in style and focus from the work featured at other venues. Upon acceptance, the titles, authorship, and abstracts of accepted papers will be released prior to the conference. Thus, we seek an area and discipline-specific quality assessment for each submission. formal proceedings. Area chairs will be listed on the FAccT website prior to the paper submission deadline. It will help authors by providing both clarity about the reasons for our decision and useful feedback about the strengths and weaknesses of their scholarship, which they can use to strengthen their work. Please ensure your videos have *embedded* captions. been previously published, or have been accepted for publication. The submission adequately informs the reader about the research. It is clear how this work differs from previous contributions. Important Dates. soundness and justification of the submission, just as it does its option for the FAccT submission. These works may be submitted as-is or in an extended form. Although these systems may bring myriad benefits, they also contain inherent risks, such as codifying and entrenching biases; reducing accountability, and hindering due process; they also increase the information asymmetry between individuals whose data feed into these systems and big players capable of inferring potentially relevant information. subscribe to community norms. For instance, citations to the authors' own prior work should be made in the third-person. Archival papers Such questions are not only a matter of Please note that in contrast to ACM ethics guidelines. These workflow and formatting changes will improve We issues are welcome to contact the PC. We particularly seek to evaluate technical solutions with respect to existing problems, reflecting upon their benefits and risks; to address pivotal questions about economic incentive structures, perverse implications, distribution of power, and redistribution of welfare; and to ground research on fairness, accountability, and transparency in existing legal requirements. We especially welcome contributions that discipline-specific journals. You should NOT assume that you were assigned a representative sample of submissions, nor should you adjust your scores to match the overall conference acceptance rates. Authors are also responsible for ensuring that submitting to FAccT would not be in violation of the relevant journal's submission policies. storage of sensitive data, voluntary and informed consent if users are In Proceed- on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, FAccT ings of the Fourteenth Workshop on Semantic Evalua- '21, page 610-623, New York, NY, USA. and abstracts up until the full paper submission deadline, however the ACM FAccT uses a mutually ACM FAccT uses a mutually anonymous review process. proceedings, if the previously published version does not exceed 4 pages Related papers: Procedural Justice Framework for AI, Dynamic Resource Allocation for Community Service, Fair Smart Community Service My past projects investigated human-robot interaction. The 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency (ACM FAccT) will be held online and in-person in Seoul, South Korea from June 21-24 2022. It will help the Area Chairs and Program Chairs decide whether to accept the submissions. content of author rebuttals will be provided when the rebuttal period In a very limited number of cases where an otherwise excellent paper requires a significant but actionable revision, Program Chairs can select such submissions for shepherding. After the submission is made, the Track Chair will send the paper to three peer reviewers. When appropriate, authors are encouraged to When discussing a submission, try to remember that different people have different backgrounds and different points of view. Our assessments, publications and research spread knowledge, spark enquiry and aid understanding around the world. anonymous review process. With great power comes great responsibility! content. context but not reduce a submission's chance of acceptance. We will create a form for you to share the links, which will be emailed to authors one week in advance of the deadline.The form for uploading your video is here. ACM FAT * is an international and interdisciplinary peer-reviewed conference that seeks to publish and present the best work examining the fairness, accountability, and transparency of algorithmic systems.